Consistent marking tool
Build a shared library of rubric-aligned feedback comments so every marker says the same thing. Students get consistent, high-quality feedback, while moderators spend less time chasing inconsistencies.
Rubrics define the grading criteria, but they don't guarantee consistent feedback quality. When multiple markers interpret the same rubric criterion differently, students notice - and they're right to be frustrated.
Inconsistent marking is one of the most common sources of student complaints and academic appeals. It undermines trust in the assessment process and creates significant extra work for moderators at the end of semester.
Common problems without a shared marking tool
A shared, rubric-aligned feedback library that every marker uses - from the same source of truth.
Organise your reusable feedback comments to mirror your assignment rubric - one page per criterion. Markers always see the right feedback for the right section.
Every marker works from the same library. Experienced markers write the canonical feedback for each rubric point; everyone else applies it consistently.
Each comment can have multiple variants - so markers can pick the wording that best fits each student while staying within the rubric's intended meaning.
See which rubric criteria are being flagged most often, which markers are deviating from the shared library, and how consistency is improving over time.
Setting up a shared rubric-aligned comment bank takes an hour. The benefits compound across every marking round from that point on.
Create a page for each rubric criterion. Add feedback comments for each performance level - from excellent to needs improvement. Add comment variants where wording context matters.
Invite tutors and co-markers to your shared group. Every marker sees the same rubric-aligned library. New markers start with the team's institutional knowledge from day one.
During marking, select the relevant rubric criterion, choose the right comment, and insert it into the student's work - in any LMS - in seconds. Moderation is faster because the language is already standardised.
Start free as an individual marker, then upgrade to a team plan to share your rubric-aligned comment bank with your whole marking team.
A consistent marking tool helps teaching teams ensure that every marker grades student work to the same standard and provides similar-quality feedback. It typically centres on a shared feedback library tied to the assignment rubric, so all markers work from the same source of truth.
You can organise your comment bank to mirror your rubric exactly - one page per criterion, with saved comments covering different performance levels. When marking, you select the relevant criterion, see the right comments, and insert them directly into the student's work.
Yes. The Marking App complements your LMS rubric rather than replacing it. You use your LMS rubric for numeric scoring, and The Marking App's comment bank to provide the qualitative written feedback that rubrics alone can't capture.
Coordinators control what's in the shared comment library - so the team is always working from approved, well-worded feedback. Analytics show which comments are used most and flag unusual patterns. And because feedback language is standardised, moderation is much faster.
Comment variants are alternative phrasings for the same feedback point. For a given rubric criterion, you might have a variant for 'minor issues' and one for 'significant issues', or variants for different student contexts. Variants let markers apply consistent rubric-aligned feedback while still tailoring it to each submission.
Individual markers can start for free with a personal comment bank. Team sharing - needed for consistent marking across multiple markers - is available on paid Group and Department plans.